2026年9月12日

Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol’s One-Year Report Card: Progress and Pain

One Year On: Customers Returning, Stock Under PressureIn September 2024, Brian Niccol took over as C...

One Year On: Customers Returning, Stock Under Pressure

In September 2024, Brian Niccol took over as CEO of Starbucks. At that time, the coffee giant was struggling: long wait times, frequent app glitches, staff shortages, and sinking morale. Niccol quickly launched the “Back to Starbucks” revival plan, targeting operations, products, and employee management.

A year later, Starbucks says customer and employee experiences are improving, with foot traffic rising in North America. Yet Wall Street is unconvinced. The company’s stock has fallen nearly 9% over the past 12 months, underperforming the S&P 500’s 19% gain.

Reforms: Efficiency, Simplification, and Management Shake-Ups

Niccol’s measures include:

  • Store efficiency: Revamping mobile ordering, limiting order sizes, new algorithms, and a 4-minute drink delivery target; reopening condiment bars; upgrading older stores with seating and ceramics.
  • Product strategy: Cutting 30% of the menu by 2025, streamlining pricing rules, and eliminating surcharges for plant-based milk.
  • Workforce management: Standardizing dress codes and rolling back remote work, requiring corporate staff to return to offices four days a week.

These steps improved the customer journey but sparked backlash. In late 2024, more than 300 U.S. stores staged strikes over pay and working conditions. In 2025, a survey found 91% of baristas reporting understaffing. Starbucks later committed $500 million to add staff hours and appoint assistant managers at every store.

China: Survival in a Price War

China, Starbucks’ second-largest market, remains a major battleground. While contributing 8% of global revenue, the brand faces fierce competition from Luckin and Cotti, which are rapidly expanding with aggressive discounting.

In summer 2025, Starbucks launched rare price promotions in China, lowering Frappuccinos and teas by 5 RMB to as low as 23 RMB. The discounts targeted non-coffee drinks, protecting core coffee pricing. Meanwhile, Starbucks rolled out concept stores, refreshed “third place” experiences, and explored equity partnerships with local firms to secure resources in real estate and supply chains.

But young Chinese consumers increasingly see coffee as a fast-moving consumer good, not a lifestyle brand. For them, affordability and taste matter more than the logo.

Conclusion: Gains with Lingering Challenges

Niccol’s reforms have stabilized operations and boosted customer sentiment, but low investor confidence, labor tensions, and cutthroat price wars in China leave Starbucks still in transition.

Customers may be back, but investor trust and China’s future growth remain uncertain.

接著讀